
The TV Presenter cosily
Chats to makers of the TV World
The problem presenting is politics
In a balanced package
Easy to understand
With well defined lines – no ambiguities.
Ambiguity does not make good TV politics.
Producer: Now as you know we’re to schedule s new series of political programmes
Writer: Yawn!
Presenter: with the agreed aim of presenting a balanced view.
Writer: what is a “balanced view”?
Presenter: To help us define balance we need to draw a hypothetical line down the middle of mainstream political ideas.
Then we can explain the two wings or sides of the dividing line; thus giving us a sensible framework to work within.
Writer: Sounds a bit too convenient to me. You have an abstract main stream – a hypothetical line – giving us a sensible framework! What does all this mean?
Producer: Well, every programme must have a framework. Anyway, the best way to tackle this is to restrict ourselves, because as you know there are as many political ideas as there are stars in the night sky. I want to concentrate on the politics that involves power.
To present a balanced view – that is Left Wing and Right Wing is the way people already see politics and ….
Writer: Then what’s the point of the programme. We’re just going to confirm what people already know. Why not present the truth instead?
Producer: Truth? Whose Truth?
Writer: The Truth, factual information, truthful and not lies.
Producer: Oh that Truth! Well I don’t know, the audiences don’t go in for truth and anyway anything we tell them is treated as the truth by the audience. We can say what the heck we like, and we do, and that satisfies the average viewer!





